तत् त्वया मम यत् कर्म व्यभिचाराद् भयात्मकम् | नाख्यातमिति जानन्तस्ते त्वामाहुस्तथा द्विज,त्वयाशक्या च दुर्वृक्त्या रक्षितुं प्रमदा द्विज । नच त्वं कृतवान् किंचिदत: प्रीतो5स्मि तेन ते
tat tvayā mama yat karma vyabhicārād bhayātmakam | nākhyātam iti jānantas te tvām āhus tathā dvija | tvayāśakyā ca durvṛktyā rakṣituṁ pramadā dvija | na ca tvaṁ kṛtavān kiñcid ataḥ prīto ’smi tena te ||
Vipula berkata: “Perbuatan itu daripadaku, yang lahir daripada ketakutan akan pelanggaran, yang engkau tidak nyatakan—mengetahui hal itu, orang ramai berkata tentangmu demikian, wahai yang dua kali lahir. Dan sesungguhnya, dengan kata-kata keras seorang wanita tidak dapat benar-benar dilindungi, wahai brāhmana. Namun engkau tidak melakukan apa-apa yang tidak patut; maka aku berkenan kepadamu kerana itu.”
विपुल उवाच
Protection and moral guidance should not rely on harsh speech; restraint and right conduct matter more than scolding. Also, one should not be blamed for wrongdoing when one has not actually acted wrongly.
Vipula addresses a brāhmaṇa, referring to an earlier fear-driven act that the brāhmaṇa did not reveal. Vipula notes that people judge the brāhmaṇa based on this, but affirms that harsh words cannot truly safeguard a woman and concludes that the brāhmaṇa did nothing blameworthy, expressing approval.