HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 11Shloka 51
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 51

Vishwarupa Darshana YogaVishwarupa Darshana Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 51 illustration

अर्जुन उवाच । दृष्ट्वेदं मानुषं रूपं तव सौम्यं जनार्दन । इदानीमस्मि संवृत्तः सचेताः प्रकृतिं गतः ॥ ११.५१ ॥

arjuna uvāca | dṛṣṭvedaṁ mānuṣaṁ rūpaṁ tava saumyaṁ janārdana | idānīm asmi saṁvṛttaḥ sacetāḥ prakṛtiṁ gataḥ || 11.51 ||

Arjuna berkata: Wahai Janardana! Melihat wujud-Mu yang lembut dalam rupa manusia ini, kini aku menjadi tenang; kesedaranku pulih, dan aku kembali kepada keadaan semula jadi.

Arjuna said: Seeing this gentle human form of Yours, O Janardana, I am now composed, restored to clarity, and returned to my natural state.

Arjuna said: Having seen this gentle human form of yours, O Janārdana, I am now settled; I have become clear-minded, having returned to (my) normal condition.

‘prakṛtiṁ gataḥ’ is sometimes read as ‘returned to my nature’ (psychological normalcy) rather than the Sāṃkhya technical ‘Prakṛti’ as a metaphysical principle; context favors the former.

अर्जुनःArjuna
अर्जुनः:
Karta
Rootअर्जुन
उवाचsaid
उवाच:
Root√वच्
दृष्ट्वाhaving seen
दृष्ट्वा:
Root√दृश्
इदम्this
इदम्:
Karma
Rootइदम्
मानुषम्human
मानुषम्:
Rootमानुष
रूपम्form
रूपम्:
Karma
Rootरूप
तवof you / your
तव:
Rootयुष्मद्
सौम्यम्gentle, benign
सौम्यम्:
Rootसौम्य
जनार्दनO Janārdana
जनार्दन:
Rootजनार्दन
इदानीम्now
इदानीम्:
Rootइदानीम्
अस्मिI am
अस्मि:
Root√अस्
संवृत्तःbecome, returned to a state
संवृत्तः:
Root√वृत्
सचेताःwith awareness; composed, conscious
सचेताः:
Rootसचेतस्
प्रकृतिम्(my) natural state; nature
प्रकृतिम्:
Karma
Rootप्रकृति
गतःgone to; attained
गतः:
Root√गम्
Arjuna
Mental equilibriumDevotional accessibilityEmbodied theism
Grounding after transcendenceHuman-scale religiosityClarity and composure

FAQs

Arjuna reports a return from cognitive overload to coherence; the ‘gentle’ form functions as a stabilizing focus that restores attention and emotional balance.

The passage supports a theology in which the ultimate can be approached through a relatable manifestation without denying transcendence.

It marks closure of the cosmic vision and re-establishes conditions for ethical instruction and decision-making.

It parallels the value of grounding techniques—returning to the familiar and manageable—after intense experiences or insights.