HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 18Shloka 16
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 16

Moksha Sannyasa YogaMoksha Sannyasa Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 16 illustration

तत्रैवं सति कर्तारमात्मानं केवलं तु यः । पश्यत्यकृतबुद्धित्वान्न स पश्यति दुर्मतिः ॥ १८.१६ ॥

tatraivaṃ sati kartāram ātmānaṃ kevalaṃ tu yaḥ | paśyaty akṛta-buddhitvān na sa paśyati durmatiḥ || 18.16 ||

Maka, walaupun demikian, sesiapa yang kerana tiada kefahaman tentang ‘bukan pelaku’ (akartṛtva) melihat dirinya semata-mata sebagai pelaku, dia yang berakal songsang sebenarnya tidak melihat.

इस प्रकार होने पर भी जो अकर्ता-बुद्धि न होने के कारण अपने-आपको ही केवल कर्ता मानकर देखता है, वह दुर्बुद्धि वास्तव में नहीं देखता।

Therefore, in such a case, the one who sees the self alone as the agent—due to an unrefined understanding—does not truly see; he is of poor judgment.

Traditional translations often read ‘akṛta-buddhitvāt’ as lacking the ‘non-doer’ insight (akartṛ-buddhi); academically it can be taken as ‘unformed/uncultivated understanding.’ Both target the error of exclusive self-doership.

तत्रthere, in that context
तत्र:
Rootतत्र
एवंthus, in this manner
एवं:
Rootएवं
सतिwhen (it) is; being the case
सति:
Adhikarana
Root√अस् (सत्)
कर्तारम्the doer (agent)
कर्तारम्:
Karma
Rootकर्तृ (√कृ)
आत्मानम्the Self
आत्मानम्:
Karma
Rootआत्मन्
केवलम्alone, exclusively
केवलम्:
Rootकेवल
तुbut, however
तु:
Rootतु
यःwho (he who)
यः:
Karta
Rootयद्
पश्यतिsees
पश्यति:
Root√पश्
अकृतबुद्धित्वात्due to the state of unrefined/undeveloped understanding
अकृतबुद्धित्वात्:
Apadana
Rootअकृतबुद्धित्व
not
:
Root
सःhe
सः:
Karta
Rootतद्
पश्यतिsees
पश्यति:
Root√पश्
दुर्मतिःthe wrong-minded person; one of perverse understanding
दुर्मतिः:
Karta
Rootदुर्मति
KrishnaArjuna
Kartṛtva (doership)Ahaṅkāra (ego-sense)Discriminative knowledgeCausal pluralism
Critique of egoic agencyInsight versus ignorancePhilosophy of action

FAQs

Over-identifying as the sole cause of events can intensify pride, guilt, and anxiety; the verse encourages a more balanced self-concept grounded in multiple determinants.

The claim undermines naïve substantial self-agency by situating action within a network of causes; it aligns with liberation-oriented knowledge that loosens identification with ‘I am the doer.’

After listing the five causes (18.14–15), the text warns that ignoring this analysis leads to misperception of agency.

In leadership or personal growth, acknowledge your role without assuming total control; this supports accountability while avoiding ego-driven narratives.