Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 18

Śrī–Indra–Bali Saṃvāda: The Departure and Fourfold Placement of Lakṣmī

सामान्यं जनक ज्ञात्वा धर्मज्ञो ज्ञानमुत्तमम्‌ | उपेत्य शतमाचार्यान्‌ मोहयामास हेतुभि:

bhīṣma uvāca | sāmānyaṃ janaka jñātvā dharmajño jñānam uttamam | upetya śatam ācāryān mohayāmāsa hetubhiḥ ||

राजा जनकाची समदृष्टी जाणून धर्मज्ञ (पंचशिख) यांनी उत्तम ज्ञान प्राप्त केले. मग शंभर आचार्यांकडे जाऊन त्यांनी युक्तियुक्त हेतूंनी त्यांना मोहित व निरुत्तर केले.

सामान्यम्commonness; sameness; general principle
सामान्यम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootसामान्य
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
जनकO Janaka
जनक:
TypeNoun
Rootजनक
FormMasculine, Vocative, Singular
ज्ञात्वाhaving known
ज्ञात्वा:
TypeVerb
Rootज्ञा
FormAbsolutive (ktvā), Parasmaipada (usage-neutral)
धर्मज्ञःthe knower of dharma
धर्मज्ञः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootधर्मज्ञ
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
ज्ञानम्knowledge
ज्ञानम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootज्ञान
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
उत्तमम्supreme; excellent
उत्तमम्:
TypeAdjective
Rootउत्तम
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
उपेत्यhaving approached
उपेत्य:
TypeVerb
Rootउप-इ
FormAbsolutive (ya), Parasmaipada (usage-neutral)
शतम्a hundred
शतम्:
TypeNoun
Rootशत
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
आचार्यान्teachers; preceptors
आचार्यान्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootआचार्य
FormMasculine, Accusative, Plural
मोहयामासhe caused to be deluded; he fascinated
मोहयामास:
TypeVerb
Rootमुह्
FormPeriphrastic perfect (liṭ, āma-prayoga), Third, Singular, Parasmaipada, Yes (ṇic)
हेतुभिःby reasons; with arguments
हेतुभिः:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootहेतु
FormMasculine, Instrumental, Plural

भीष्म उवाच

B
Bhishma
J
Janaka
H
hundred teachers (śata ācāryāḥ)

Educational Q&A

Ethical and spiritual excellence is marked by even-mindedness (sāmānya) and the capacity to discern true knowledge (uttama-jñāna) beyond mere institutional authority; reasoned inquiry can expose superficial learning.

A dharma-knower, recognizing Janaka’s impartial disposition, approaches a gathering of a hundred teachers and, through sharp reasoning, overwhelms or captivates them—depicting a philosophical contest that highlights the difference between genuine insight and conventional scholarship.