निर्णये वा महाबुद्धे सर्वधर्मविदां वर । प्रत्यक्षमागमो वेति कि तयो: कारणं भवेत्
Vaiśampāyana uvāca: nirṇaye vā mahābuddhe sarvadharmavidāṃ vara | pratyakṣam āgamo veti kiṃ tayoḥ kāraṇaṃ bhavet ||
हे महाबुद्धिमान पितामह, सर्व धर्मज्ञांमध्ये श्रेष्ठ! धर्मविषयक निर्णय करताना प्रत्यक्ष प्रमाण घ्यावे की आगम? या दोघांपैकी सिद्धान्त-निर्णयात मुख्य कारण कोणते ठरते?
वैशम्पायन उवाच
The verse frames a foundational inquiry in dharma-discourse: when ethical or religious conclusions are disputed, what counts as the primary pramāṇa (means of valid knowledge)—direct perception (pratyakṣa) or authoritative tradition/scripture (āgama)?
Vaiśampāyana reports a question addressed to the Pitāmaha (Bhīṣma) in the Anuśāsana context: the interlocutor seeks guidance on how to adjudicate dharma—by what is directly seen/experienced or by what is transmitted as authoritative teaching.