Shukra’s Saṃjīvanī, Shiva’s Containment of the Asuras, and Indra’s Recovery of Power
सम्भुनामासुरपतिः स ब्रह्मणमयोधयत् महौजसं कुजम्भश्च विष्णुं दैत्यान्तकारिणम्
sambhunāmāsurapatiḥ sa brahmaṇamayodhayat mahaujasaṃ kujambhaśca viṣṇuṃ daityāntakāriṇam
ശംഭു എന്ന അസുരാധിപൻ യുദ്ധത്തിൽ ബ്രഹ്മാവിനോട് പോരാടി; മഹൗജസ്സനായ കുജംഭൻ ദൈത്യാന്തകനായ വിഷ്ണുവിനോട് യുദ്ധം ചെയ്തു।
{ "primaryRasa": "vira", "secondaryRasa": "raudra", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
No. The verse explicitly calls Sambhu an ‘asura-pati’ (Asura lord). In Purāṇic literature, identical or similar names can occur across different beings; here it is a proper name of an Asura leader, not Śiva’s epithet.
It frames Viṣṇu as the cosmic corrective force who ends Daitya aggression. Even without naming a specific avatāra, the epithet signals Viṣṇu’s recurring function: restoring balance when Daityas threaten the gods and the world-order.
This is a common Purāṇic battle technique: a ‘roster’ (yoddhā-paricaya) that maps cosmic factions by pairing champions. It emphasizes the scale of the conflict and the hierarchy of opponents (major gods matched with major Asura leaders).