The Second Sin-Destroying Hymn (Pāpaśamana Stava) and the Syncretic Praise of Hari-Hara
स्रुक्स्रुवौ परधामासि कपालोलूखलो ऽरणिः यज्ञपात्राणेयस्त्वमेकधा बहुधा त्रिधा
sruksruvau paradhāmāsi kapālolūkhalo 'raṇiḥ yajñapātrāṇeyastvamekadhā bahudhā tridhā
Trivikrama: Viṣṇu as ‘the three-stepper’ (cosmic stride form); Kālinḍī: the Yamunā river (named from Mount Kalinda), a major tīrtha-river; Liṅgabheda: a tīrtha-name (lit. ‘division/cleft of the liṅga’), associated with Śaiva worship; Bhava: epithet of Śiva (‘the Becoming/Existence’), here ‘vibhu’ (all-pervading, mighty); vibhu: powerful, omnipresent lord; Kedāra: a celebrated Śaiva kṣetra/tīrtha (Kedāranātha region), here also hosting a Viṣṇu-presence as Mādhava; Mādhava: epithet of Viṣṇu (‘belonging to Madhu / springtime lord’); Śauri: epithet of Kṛṣṇa/Viṣṇu (‘descendant of Śūra’); Kubjāmra: a place-name (lit. ‘crooked mango-grove’), treated as a tīrtha; Hṛṣṭamūrdhaja: a deity-epithet/name (lit. ‘born from/with delighted hair on the head’), indicating a localized divine form at Kubjāmra.
{ "primaryRasa": "adbhuta", "secondaryRasa": "shanta", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
The list intentionally spans orthodox Vedic yajña and ascetic/Śaiva ritual symbolism. By identifying the Lord with both, the text asserts that the sacred is not confined to one ritual idiom; all legitimate sacrificial and transformative acts are grounded in the same Īśvara.
At minimum it states a metaphysical principle: the deity is one reality appearing as many forms. ‘Threefold’ commonly evokes Purāṇic/Vedic triads (e.g., three sacred fires, three Vedas, or three guṇas). The verse leaves the triad open, allowing multiple orthodox readings while preserving the core claim of unity.
In tirtha-mahātmya chapters, hymns often universalize the pilgrimage act: the merit of a place is tied to recognizing the Lord as present in the very structure of worship (yajña). The stuti supplies the theological lens through which the geography becomes spiritually efficacious.