चक्षुर््या न च कर्णाभ्यां संशृूणोति समीक्षते । कस्मादेनं समुत्सूज्य न गृहान् गच्छताशु वै,यह न तो आँखोंसे देखता है और न कानोंसे कुछ सुनता ही है। फिर इसे त्यागकर तुमलोग जल्दी अपने घर क्यों नहीं चले जाते
cakṣurbhyāṁ na ca karṇābhyāṁ saṁśṛṇoti samīkṣate | kasmād enaṁ samutsṛjya na gṛhān gacchatāśu vai ||
ജംബൂകൻ പറഞ്ഞു—“അവൻ കണ്ണുകളാൽ കാണുന്നില്ല, ചെവികളാൽ കേൾക്കുന്നില്ല. പിന്നെ അവനെ ഉപേക്ഷിച്ച് നിങ്ങൾ വേഗം നിങ്ങളുടെ വീടുകളിലേക്കു എന്തുകൊണ്ട് പോകുന്നില്ല?”
जम्बुक उवाच
The verse frames an ethical provocation: if someone appears incapable of seeing or hearing, should others abandon him and return to their own concerns? In the Shanti Parva’s moral discourse, such a question typically tests the listener’s commitment to dharma—especially compassion and responsibility toward the vulnerable—rather than endorsing neglect.
Jambuka addresses a group (plural imperative ‘gacchata’) and points out that the person in question neither sees nor hears. He then challenges them: why not leave him and go home quickly? The line functions as a pointed rhetorical move within a broader ethical discussion, pressing the audience to respond with the dharmic course of action.