Shloka 16
Gāndhārī’s Grief, Vyāsa’s Pacification, and the Ethics of Retaliation (गान्धारी-शोकः शमोपदेशश्च)
हतेषु पार्थिवेन्द्रेषु पुत्रेषु निहतेषु च । पाण्डुपुत्रेषु वै शर्म प्रीतिश्नाप्यवतिछ्ठते,“समस्त राजाओं तथा अपने पुत्रोंके मारे जानेपर अब मेरा प्रेम और हितचिन्तन पाण्डुके इन पुत्रोंपर ही आश्रित है”
hateṣu pārthivendreṣu putreṣu nihateṣu ca | pāṇḍuputreṣu vai śarma prītiś cāpy avatiṣṭhate ||
ໄວສັມປາຍະນະ ກ່າວວ່າ: «ເມື່ອບັນດາກະສັດຖືກສັງຫານ ແລະລູກຊາຍຂອງຂ້າພະເຈົ້າກໍຖືກສັງຫານແລ້ວ, ບັດນີ້ຄວາມຮັກ ແລະຄວາມຫ່ວງໃຍເພື່ອສະຫວັດດີຂອງຂ້າພະເຈົ້າ ພຶງພາຢູ່ແຕ່ລູກຊາຍຂອງປານດຸເທົ່ານັ້ນ»
वैशम्पायन उवाच
Educational Q&A
In the wake of total loss, ethical responsibility shifts from partisan attachment to the duty of protecting the remaining rightful heirs; compassion and welfare-mindedness should prevail over vengeance after war.
The narrator reports a post-battle sentiment: with the kings and the speaker’s sons dead, affection and concern are now directed toward the sons of Pāṇḍu, signaling a move toward acceptance and support of the survivors.