Daṇḍa, Ahiṃsā, and Proportional Kingship: The Dyumatsena–Satyavān Dialogue (दण्ड-अहिंसा-विवेकः)
सदाचारो मतो धर्म: सन्तस्त्वाचारलक्षणा: । साध्यासाध्यं कथं शक्यं सदाचारो हालक्षण:
sadācāro mato dharmaḥ santaś tv ācāralakṣaṇāḥ | sādhyāsādhyaṃ kathaṃ śakyaṃ sadācāro hālakṣaṇaḥ ||
ຢຸທິສຖິຣະ ກ່າວວ່າ: «ຄວາມປະພຶດດີ (ສັດຈາຣ) ຖືກນັບເປັນ ທັມມະ ແລະຜູ້ດີຜູ້ສົງົບ (ສັນຕະ) ຖືກຮູ້ຈັກດ້ວຍຄວາມປະພຶດຂອງເຂົາ. ແຕ່ຈະກຳນົດໄດ້ແນວໃດວ່າ ສິ່ງໃດຄວນເຮັດແທ້ ແລະສິ່ງໃດບໍ່ຄວນເຮັດ? ດ້ວຍເຄື່ອງໝາຍອັນໃດຈຶ່ງຈະຮູ້ຈັກຄວາມປະພຶດດີນັ້ນໄດ້?»
युधिछिर उवाच
Dharma is often defined through sadācāra (right conduct) and exemplified by the virtuous, yet Yudhiṣṭhira presses for a clearer criterion: how to distinguish truly obligatory action from forbidden action, and what reliable signs define ‘right conduct’ itself.
In the instructional setting of the Śānti Parva, Yudhiṣṭhira questions the basis of moral authority. He acknowledges the common claim that dharma is known through good conduct and the example of the good, but asks for a more precise method to judge right and wrong in practice.