Śaṅkha–Likhita Upākhyāna: Daṇḍa, Confession, and the Purification of Kingship (शङ्ख-लिखितोपाख्यानम्)
दैवेनाभ्याहतो राजा कर्मकाले महद्ुते । न साधयति यत् कर्म न तत्राहुरतिक्रमम्
daivenābhyāhato rājā karmakāle mahadute | na sādhayati yat karma na tatrāhur atikramam ||
ໄວສັມປາຍະນະ ກ່າວວ່າ: «ເມື່ອກະສັດຖືກຊະຕາ (daiva) ກະທົບໃນເວລາທີ່ຄວນລົງມືເຮັດການ, ແລະ ດ້ວຍເຫດນັ້ນບໍ່ອາດສຳເລັດວຽກທີ່ຕັ້ງໃຈໄວ້, ບັນດາຜູ້ຮູ້ບໍ່ເອີ້ນວ່າເປັນການລ່ວງລະເມີດທາງທຳ. ຄວາມລົ້ມເຫຼວນັ້ນຖືກໂທດໃຫ້ແກ່ຊະຕາອັນແຮງກ້າ, ບໍ່ແມ່ນການຈົ່ງໃຈຝ່າຝືນໜ້າທີ່»។
वैशम्पायन उवाच
If a ruler fails to complete an intended duty because overpowering fate intervenes at the crucial moment, that failure is not judged as a willful breach of dharma; culpability depends on intention and agency, not merely on outcome.
Vaiśampāyana states a general principle used in ethical reasoning: when circumstances attributed to daiva obstruct a king during the time of action, the tradition does not label the resulting non-fulfillment as an atikrama (transgression).