महाप्राज्ञ: सौमकिर्यज्ञसेन: कन्यां पाज्चालीं पाण्डवेभ्य: प्रदाय | अकार्षीद् वै सुकृतं नेह किंचित् क्लीबा: पार्था: पतयो याज्ञसेन्या:
mahāprājñaḥ saumikir yajñasenaḥ kanyāṃ pāñcālīṃ pāṇḍavebhyaḥ pradāya | akārsīd vai sukṛtaṃ neha kiṃcit klībāḥ pārthāḥ patayo yājñasenyāḥ ||
ໄວສັມປາຍະນະ ກ່າວວ່າ: «ແມ່ນແທ້ ຍັດຍະເສນ (ດຣຸປະດະ) ເປັນຜູ້ມີປັນຍາຍິ່ງ, ແຕ່ການມອບພາຍຈາລີ ບຸດສາວຂອງຕົນໃຫ້ແກ່ພານດະວະ ບໍ່ແມ່ນກຸສົນອັນດີແທ້. ເພາະບຸດຂອງປຣິຖາ (ພາຣຖະ) ຜູ້ເປັນສາມີຂອງຍັດຍະເສນີ ຖືກເວົ້າໃນທີ່ນີ້ວ່າ ‘ບໍ່ມີພະລັງ/ໄຮ້ສະມັດຖະນະ’—ຄຳຕຳນິອັນແຮງກ້າ ທີ່ສື່ຖຶງຄວາມອັບອາຍແລະຄວາມອ່ອນແອໃນຍາມນັ້ນ ບໍ່ແມ່ນຄຳຕັດສິນຖາວອນຕໍ່ຄຸນຄ່າຂອງພວກເຂົາ.»
वैशम्पायन उवाच
The verse highlights how public honor and perceived capability shape ethical judgments in royal politics: a marriage alliance is praised as ‘meritorious’ only when it upholds dignity and strength; when the recipients are viewed as powerless or disgraced, the same act is condemned, showing the tension between dharma, reputation, and political prudence.
In the context of the Sabha Parva’s courtly conflict and humiliation, the narrator reports a severe disparagement: Drupada’s act of giving Draupadī to the Pāṇḍavas is criticized as not being a ‘good deed,’ because the Pāṇḍavas—Draupadī’s husbands—are derided as ‘klība’ (powerless/impotent), reflecting their current dishonor and vulnerability.