सौबलं च तदा तात नीतिमानिति मन्यते
saubalaṃ ca tadā tāta nītimān iti manyate
ಮತ್ತು ಆ ಸಮಯದಲ್ಲಿ, ತಾತ, ಅವನು ಸೌಬಲನನ್ನು (ಶಕುನಿಯನ್ನು) ಸಹ ನೀತಿವಂತನೆಂದು ಭಾವಿಸಿದನು.
संजय उवाच
The verse highlights how, in wartime deliberations, figures are evaluated through the lens of nīti (policy and strategy). It implicitly raises an ethical tension in the epic: being ‘nītimān’ can mean skill in political calculation, which may or may not align with dharma.
Sañjaya reports to Dhṛtarāṣṭra that, at that point in the unfolding events, someone (contextually a leading Kaurava decision-maker) considered Saubala (Śakuni) to be prudent and politically astute, indicating Śakuni’s perceived influence in counsel and strategy.