HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 17Shloka 21
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Shraddhatraya Vibhaga Yoga, Shloka 21

Shraddhatraya Vibhaga Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 21 illustration

यत्तु प्रत्युपकारार्थं फलमुद्दिश्य वा पुनः । दीयते च परिक्लिष्टं तद्दानं राजसं स्मृतम् ॥ १७.२१ ॥

yat tu pratyupakārārthaṁ phalam uddiśya vā punaḥ | dīyate ca parikliṣṭaṁ tad dānaṁ rājasaṁ smṛtam || 17.21 ||

ಆದರೆ ಪ್ರತಿಫಲ ಪಡೆಯುವ ಉದ್ದೇಶದಿಂದ, ಅಥವಾ ಫಲವನ್ನು ದೃಷ್ಟಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಇಟ್ಟು, ಮನಸ್ಸಿಗೆ ಕಷ್ಟವಾಗುವಂತೆ/ಅನಿಚ್ಛೆಯಿಂದ ನೀಡುವ ದಾನವು ರಾಜಸವೆಂದು ಸ್ಮರಿಸಲ್ಪಡುತ್ತದೆ.

But charity given with the aim of receiving something in return, or with a view to its reward, and given reluctantly, is considered rājasa.

That gift which is given for reciprocal benefit, or again with reward in mind, and given with strain/reluctance, is remembered as rājasa.

parikliṣṭa is rendered “reluctantly,” “with distress,” or “under strain,” indicating either emotional reluctance or burdensome calculation. The verse emphasizes transactional intention (reciprocity/reward) as the rājasa marker.

यत्that (which)
यत्:
Rootयद्
तुbut
तु:
Rootतु
प्रत्युपकारार्थम्for the sake of a return (repayment of favor)
प्रत्युपकारार्थम्:
Rootप्रत्युपकारार्थ
फलम्fruit; reward
फलम्:
Karma
Rootफल
उद्दिश्यhaving in view; intending
उद्दिश्य:
Rootउद्-√दिश्
वाor
वा:
Rootवा
पुनःagain; further
पुनः:
Rootपुनः
दीयतेis given
दीयते:
Root√दा (दाने)
and
:
Root
परिक्लिष्टम्reluctantly; with distress/strain (given grudgingly)
परिक्लिष्टम्:
Rootपरि-√क्लिश्
तत्that
तत्:
Rootतद्
दानम्gift; charity
दानम्:
Rootदान
राजसम्rajasic
राजसम्:
Rootराजस
स्मृतम्is considered; is said to be
स्मृतम्:
Root√स्मृ (स्मरणे)
Krishna
RajasKarma-phalaEthics of motivation
Transactional givingAttachment to outcomesAmbivalence in generosity

FAQs

It highlights how giving can be compromised by bargaining and resentment, turning generosity into a stressful exchange rather than a free offering.

Because it strengthens attachment to results and social leverage, rājasa dāna is treated as less purifying than sāttvika giving.

The verse contrasts with 17.20 by shifting from duty-based, discerning giving to reward-based, reciprocity-seeking giving.

When donating or helping, notice expectations (credit, influence, returns). Reducing those expectations aligns the act more closely with non-attachment.