Shloka 18
Veṅkaṭācala Māhātmya: Bhakti-Lakṣaṇa, Nārasiṁha-tīrtha, and the Secret Darśana-Vidhi of Śrīnivāsa
विष्णोर्भद्रे हस्तपादादिकानां भेदज्ञानं द्वेषमाहुर्महान्तः / अवताराणा छेदभेदादिकं च तथोच्यते मरणस्यापि चिन्ता
viṣṇorbhadre hastapādādikānāṃ bhedajñānaṃ dveṣamāhurmahāntaḥ / avatārāṇā chedabhedādikaṃ ca tathocyate maraṇasyāpi cintā
ឱ អ្នកមានសុភមង្គល! ព្រះបណ្ឌិតទាំងឡាយថា ការគិតថាមានភាពខុសគ្នានៅក្នុងព្រះវិṣṇu—ដូចជាខុសគ្នារវាងដៃ ជើង និងអវយវៈផ្សេងៗ—គឺជាទម្រង់នៃការប្រឆាំង (ទ្វេសៈ)។ ដូចគ្នានេះ ការនិយាយអំពីអវតាររបស់ព្រះអង្គថា «ត្រូវកាត់», «ត្រូវបែងចែក» ជាដើម ហើយសូម្បីតែការព្រួយអំពី «មរណភាព» របស់ព្រះអង្គ ក៏ត្រូវបានចាត់ទុកដូចគ្នា (ជាកំហុសធ្ងន់)។
Lord Vishnu
Concept: Bheda-jñāna (fragmenting distinctions) regarding Viṣṇu’s limbs or speaking of avatāras as ‘cut/divided’—and imagining His ‘death’—is treated as dveṣa, because it denies His non-dual, imperishable nature.
Vedantic Theme: Abheda of Brahman/Īśvara; avatāra as līlā without real division; ajaratva/amaratva (deathlessness) of the Supreme.
Application: Use reverent, theologically careful language: describe avatāras as manifestations (āvirbhāva) rather than divisions; contemplate the Lord as akhaṇḍa and nitya; avoid sensational or reductive talk about divine form.
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: raudra
Related Themes: Garuda Purana 3.24.17 (status-comparison as dveṣa); Garuda Purana 3.24.19 (dveṣa toward devotees and their words)
FAQs
This verse frames such division-thinking as ‘dveṣa’—a hostile misconception—because it treats the divine, deathless Lord as a materially divisible body.
It teaches that Vishnu and His incarnations are not subject to cutting, splitting, or death; describing them in those terms is considered a serious theological error.
Cultivate respectful, non-reductive devotion: avoid mocking or materializing the divine form, and focus on reverence, unity of the Lord’s being, and steady bhakti.