HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 17Shloka 7
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 7

Shraddhatraya Vibhaga YogaShraddhatraya Vibhaga Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 7 illustration

आहारस्त्वपि सर्वस्य त्रिविधो भवति प्रियः । यज्ञस्तपस्तथा दानं तेषां भेदमिमं शृणु ॥ १७.७ ॥

āhāras tv api sarvasya trividhō bhavati priyaḥ | yajñas tapas tathā dānaṃ teṣāṃ bhedam imaṃ śṛṇu || 17.7 ||

Even the food dear to each person is of three kinds; likewise sacrifice (yajña), austerity (tapas), and charity (dāna) are also of three kinds. Hear now this distinction among them.

सबका प्रिय भोजन भी तीन प्रकार का होता है तथा यज्ञ, तप और दान भी (तीन प्रकार के होते हैं); उनके इस भेद को सुनो।

Food, too, which is dear to everyone, is of three kinds; likewise sacrifice, austerity, and giving—hear now their distinctions.

Most translations agree closely here; the main interpretive point is that ‘trividha’ anticipates classification by the three guṇas (sattva/rajas/tamas) applied across diet and religious-ethical practices.

आहारःfood; diet
आहारः:
Karta
Rootआहार
तुbut; indeed
तु:
Rootतु
अपिalso; even
अपि:
Rootअपि
सर्वस्यof everyone; of all
सर्वस्य:
Rootसर्व
त्रिविधःthreefold
त्रिविधः:
Karta
Rootत्रिविध
भवतिis; becomes
भवति:
Root√भू
प्रियःdear; pleasing
प्रियः:
Rootप्रिय
यज्ञःsacrifice; worship-offering
यज्ञः:
Karta
Rootयज्ञ
तपःausterity; penance
तपः:
Karta
Rootतपस्
तथाand likewise; also
तथा:
Rootतथा
दानम्gift; charity
दानम्:
Karta
Rootदान
तेषाम्of those (things)
तेषाम्:
Rootतद्
भेदम्difference; distinction
भेदम्:
Karma
Rootभेद
इमम्this
इमम्:
Rootइदम्
शृणुhear; listen
शृणु:
Root√श्रु
Krishna
GuṇasĀhāra (diet)Yajña (sacrifice/ritual offering)Dāna (giving)
Threefold typologyEthics of practiceEmbodied spiritualityMotivation and habit

FAQs

By classifying preferences as threefold, the verse implies that habits—including diet—shape temperament and attention, influencing how one approaches discipline and generosity.

The guṇa framework situates human action within nature’s modalities; the verse sets up how apparently ‘ordinary’ choices (food) and ‘religious’ acts (yajña, tapas, dāna) share the same ontological conditioning.

It introduces the next subsection (17.8–17.10 and onward), where specific examples of sattvic, rajasic, and tamasic forms are enumerated.

It supports a comparative approach to lifestyle and ethics: examining how consumption patterns and charitable or disciplined behaviors reflect underlying motivations and mental qualities.