Skanda’s Svastyayana and the Slaying of Taraka and Mahisha
तत् कार्तिकेयः प्रियमेव तथ्यं श्रुत्वा वचः प्राह सुरान् विहस्य कथं हि मातामहनप्तृकं वधे स्वभ्रातरं भ्रातृसुतं च मातुः
tat kārtikeyaḥ priyameva tathyaṃ śrutvā vacaḥ prāha surān vihasya kathaṃ hi mātāmahanaptṛkaṃ vadhe svabhrātaraṃ bhrātṛsutaṃ ca mātuḥ
彼らにとっては愛すべき、しかし真実として述べられたその言葉を聞いて、カールッティケーヤは苦い微笑を浮かべて神々に言った。「この殺害において、どうして私は自らの兄弟を討ち、さらに母の甥—すなわち兄の子—をも討つことができようか。」
{ "primaryRasa": "hasya", "secondaryRasa": "karuna", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
It signals a maternal-line kinship claim: Skanda frames the target as belonging to his extended family network, strengthening the argument that the proposed slaying is not morally neutral but entangled with lineage obligations.
In Purāṇic diction, ‘vihasya’ can convey restrained irony: Skanda highlights the tension between the gods’ urgent command and the ethical impropriety (from his perspective) of killing close kin, without outright defiance.
The verse shows hesitation and moral interrogation rather than final refusal. Such exchanges typically precede a resolution where divine duty is clarified—often by invoking a higher dharma that overrides personal attachment when cosmic order is threatened.