Shloka 114
Ulūka’s Provocation and Keśava’s Counter-Message (उलूकदूत्ये केशवप्रत्युत्तरम्)
“तुम सब लोग अमनुष्योचित दीन दशाको प्राप्त हो दासभावमें स्थित थे। उस समय ट्रपदकुमारी कृष्णाने ही दासताके संकटमें पड़े हुए तुम सब लोगोंको छुड़ाया था ।। अवोचं यत् षण्ढतिलानहं वस्तथ्यमेव तत् | धृता हि वेणी पार्थेन विराटनगरे तदा,“मैंने जो उन दिनों तुमलोगोंको हिजड़ा या नपुंसक कहा था, वह ठीक ही निकला; क्योंकि अज्ञातवासके समय विराटनगरमें अर्जुनको अपने सिरपर स्त्रियोंकी भाँति वेणी धारण करनी पड़ी
sañjaya uvāca | yūyaṁ sarve ’manuṣyocitāṁ dīna-daśāṁ prāptā dāsa-bhāve sthitā āsata | tadā draupadī-kumārī kṛṣṇā eva dāsatā-saṅkaṭe patitān yuṣmān sarvān amocayat || avocaṁ yat ṣaṇḍha-tilān ahaṁ vas-tathyam eva tat | dhṛtā hi veṇī pārthena virāṭa-nagare tadā ||
サンジャヤは言った。「おまえたちは皆、男にふさわしからぬ卑しき惨状に堕ち、奴の心で生きていた。その時、ただ一人、ドルパダ王の王女クリシュナー（ドラウパディー）が、奴隷の災厄に囚われたおまえたちを救い出したのだ。そして私が当時、おまえたちを宦官のようだと言ったのは、まさしく当たっていた。隠遁の期間、ヴィラータの都で、パールタ（アルジュナ）は女のように髪を編んで結わねばならなかったからだ。」
संजय उवाच
Educational Q&A
The passage highlights two ethical tensions: (1) gratitude and recognition of Draupadī’s decisive agency in rescuing the afflicted, and (2) the moral danger of humiliating speech—Sanjaya reports a harsh insult that equates enforced disguise and vulnerability with loss of manhood. It invites reflection on how dharma is upheld not merely by status or gendered appearance, but by conduct, courage, and loyalty in crisis.
Sanjaya recounts that the group had been reduced to a servile, helpless condition, and that Draupadī (called Kṛṣṇā) freed them from that predicament. He then recalls having earlier mocked them as ‘eunuchs,’ claiming it was ‘confirmed’ because during the incognito exile (ajñātavāsa) Arjuna, in Virāṭa’s city, adopted a feminine presentation, including wearing a braid (veṇī).