Shloka 19
Daṇḍa, Ahiṃsā, and Proportional Kingship: The Dyumatsena–Satyavān Dialogue (दण्ड-अहिंसा-विवेकः)
येनैवान्य: प्रभवति सो5परानपि बाधते । आचाराणामनैकाग्र्यं सर्वेषामुपलक्षयेत्,जिस धर्मको अपनाकर एक व्यक्ति उन्नति करता है, उसीसे दूसरा दूसरोंको पीड़ा देता है; अत: सबके लिये आचारोंकी एकरूपता कोई नहीं दिखा सकता
yenai vānyaḥ prabhavati so 'parān api bādhate | ācārāṇām anaikāgryaṃ sarveṣām upalakṣayet ||
ユディシュティラは言った。「ある者を栄えさせるその同じ行いの道が、別の者の手にかかれば、他者を悩ませ抑えつける手段となりうる。ゆえに、万人に等しく当てはまる唯一の行いの基準を示すことはできない。」
युधिछिर उवाच
Educational Q&A
Dharma and proper conduct (ācāra) are not always one-size-fits-all: the same practice that benefits one person can become harmful when adopted by another. Hence ethical judgment must consider the agent’s nature, capacity, and context rather than insisting on a single uniform rule for everyone.
In the Śānti Parva’s reflective discourse on dharma after the war, Yudhiṣṭhira raises a subtle ethical concern: he notes that people differ, and therefore the same ‘dharma’ or mode of conduct can lead to different outcomes—uplift for one, harm for another—making universal prescriptions difficult.