Daṇḍa as the Foundation of Social Order (दण्डप्रतिष्ठा)
विनीतक्रोधहर्षा हि मन्दा वनमुपाश्रिता: । विना वध॑ न कुर्वन्ति तापसा: प्राणयापनम्
vinīta-krodha-harṣā hi mandā vanam upāśritāḥ | vinā vadhaṁ na kurvanti tāpasāḥ prāṇa-yāpanam ||
アルジュナは言った。「怒りも歓喜の昂ぶりも鎮めながら、なお理解の鈍い者は、森に退いて苦行者の生を取る。だがそれでも、何らかの形の殺生なくしては命をつなげぬ。」
अजुन उवाच
Arjuna argues that mere withdrawal to the forest and adopting ascetic externals does not automatically resolve the ethical problem of violence, because sustaining embodied life often entails some harm; therefore dharma must be judged with discernment, not by appearances alone.
In the Shanti Parva’s discussion on dharma and conduct, Arjuna speaks critically about certain Kshatriyas who, lacking true insight, renounce to the forest; he points out that even ascetics cannot maintain life entirely without causing harm.