कुट॒म्बमास्थिते त्यागं न पश्यामि नराधिप । राजसूयाश्दमेधेषु सर्वमेधेषु वा पुन:,नरेश्वर! जिसपर कुट॒म्बका भार हो, उसके लिये त्यागका विधान नहीं देखनेमें आता है। उसे तो राजसूय, अश्वमेध अथवा सर्वमेध यज्ञोंमें प्रवृत्त होना चाहिये
kūṭambam āsthite tyāgaṁ na paśyāmi narādhipa | rājasūyāśvamedheṣu sarvamedheṣu vā punaḥ ||
ナクラは言った。「人の王よ、家の責務を負う者にとって、捨離(ティヤーガ)を規範とは見ない。むしろラージャスーヤ、アシュヴァメーダ、あるいはサルヴァメーダといった大いなる祭祀の務めに励み、退くのではなく、正しく認められた行いによって義務を全うすべきである。」
नकुल उवाच
Renunciation is not presented as the primary path for someone bound by household responsibilities; instead, dharma is fulfilled through rightful action—especially prescribed public and royal duties such as major sacrifices—so that obligation, social order, and merit are upheld.
Nakula addresses a king (narādhipa), arguing within a broader Shānti Parva discussion on dharma that a householder should not abandon duties for renunciation, but should pursue sanctioned, duty-centered religious action exemplified by great Vedic sacrifices.