Shloka 17
सभा पर्व, अध्याय ३७ — युधिष्ठिरस्य भीष्मोपदेशः
Yudhiṣṭhira’s Consultation and Bhīṣma’s Counsel in the Assembly
नैवर्त्विंग नैव चाचार्यो न राजा मधुसूदन: । अर्चितश्न कुरुश्रेष्ठ किमन्यत्प्रियकाम्यया,कुरुश्रेष्ठ! मधुसूदन कृष्ण न ऋत्विज् है, न आचार्य है और न राजा ही है; फिर तुमने किस प्रिय कामनासे इसकी पूजा की है?
naiva ṛtviṅ naiva cācāryo na rājā madhusūdanaḥ | arcitaś ca kuruśreṣṭha kim anyat priyakāmyayā ||
シシュパーラは言った。「クル族の最上よ。マドゥを討ったマドゥスーダナ・クリシュナは、汝の祭官（ルトヴィジュ）でもなく、師でもなく、王でもない。それなのに、いかなる別の望み——ただ歓心を買うためか——によって彼を礼拝したのか。」
शिशुपाल उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse highlights a tension between ritual-social norms (honoring priests, teachers, and kings by rank) and a deeper valuation of merit and spiritual greatness. Śiśupāla argues from conventional hierarchy to question Kṛṣṇa’s precedence, implicitly critiquing honor based on personal devotion or political preference.
During Yudhiṣṭhira’s great royal rite (Rājasūya context), Kṛṣṇa is publicly honored. Śiśupāla objects, claiming Kṛṣṇa holds none of the standard roles that warrant such worship—priest, preceptor, or king—and insinuates that the honor is merely to gratify personal liking or favoritism.