द्रोणवध-प्रश्नः
Droṇa’s Fall: Dhṛtarāṣṭra’s Inquiry
हंसस्तु राजत: श्रीमान् ध्वजे घण्टापताकवान् । सहदेवस्य दुर्धर्षो द्विषतां शोकवर्धन:,सहदेवकी ध्वजामें घंटा और पताकाके साथ चाँदीके बने सुन्दर हंसका चिह्न था। वह दुर्धर्ष ध्वज शत्रुओंका शोक बढ़ानेवाला था
haṃsastu rājataḥ śrīmān dhvaje ghaṇṭāpatākavān | sahadevasya durdharṣo dviṣatāṃ śokavardhanaḥ ||
サンジャヤは言った。「サハデーヴァの旗には、鈴と飾りの流れ旗を伴う、見事な銀の白鳥が描かれていた。その難敵の旗印は、敵にとって対面しがたく、彼に抗う者の憂いを増した。」
संजय उवाच
The verse highlights how outward symbols—standards, emblems, and martial insignia—serve ethical and psychological functions in war: they strengthen one’s side through confidence and identity while warning opponents of resolve and prowess. In the Mahābhārata’s moral landscape, such symbols underscore the gravity of kṣatriya-duty and the burdensome consequences (sorrow) that conflict brings.
Sañjaya is describing the battle array by detailing Sahadeva’s standard: a beautiful silver swan with bell and streamers. The description emphasizes that Sahadeva’s banner is formidable and intimidating, suggesting his readiness and the fear it inspires among enemies.