अन्नदान-प्रशंसा (Praise of the Gift of Food) | Annadāna-Praśaṃsā
तात! यदि ब्राह्मण क्षत्रियोंके द्वारा सम्मानित न हों तथा क्षत्रियमें सदा रहनेवाले निष्ठर कर्मको देखकर ब्राह्मण भी उनका परित्याग कर दें तो वे क्षत्रिय वेद, यज्ञ, उत्तम लोक और आजीविकासे भी भ्रष्ट हो जायेँ। उस दशामें ब्राह्मणोंका आश्रय लेनेवाले तुम्हारे सिवा उन दूसरे क्षत्रियोंक जीवित रहनेका क्या प्रयोजन है? ।। अन्न ते वर्तयिष्यामि यथा धर्म सनातनम् | राजन्यो ब्राह्मणान् राजन् पुरा परिचचार ह
tāta! yadi brāhmaṇāḥ kṣatriyaiḥ na satkṛtāḥ syuḥ, tathā kṣatriye sadā vartamānaṃ niṣṭhuraṃ karma dṛṣṭvā brāhmaṇā api tān parityajeyuḥ, tadā te kṣatriyā vedāt, yajñāt, uttamalokāt, ājīvikāyāś ca bhraṣṭāḥ syuḥ. tasmin daśāyāṃ brāhmaṇānām āśrayaṃ gṛhṇatāṃ tvām ṛte teṣāṃ anyeṣāṃ kṣatriyāṇāṃ jīvitena kiṃ prayojanam? annaṃ te vartayiṣyāmi yathā dharmaḥ sanātanaḥ | rājanyo brāhmaṇān rājann purā paricacāra ha ||
ビーシュマは言った。「わが子よ、もし刹帝利がブラーフマナを敬わず、また刹帝利に常住する苛烈な行いを見てブラーフマナが彼らを見捨てるなら、その刹帝利たちはヴェーダから、祭祀から、最上の世界から、さらには生業からさえも堕ちてしまう。そのような時、ブラーフマナに帰依する汝を除いて、ほかの刹帝利が生き長らえることに何の意味があろうか。われは永遠のダルマに従い、食をもって汝を養おう。古の世には、王よ、刹帝利はブラーフマナに仕えたのだから。」
भीष्म उवाच
Bhishma teaches that royal power must be restrained and guided by reverence for Brahminical learning and ritual authority; when Kshatriyas fail to honor Brahmins (and Brahmins withdraw support), the Kshatriyas lose access to Vedic legitimacy, sacrificial merit, higher spiritual destinations, and even stable livelihood—so the ruler’s ethical survival depends on maintaining this reciprocal dharmic relationship.
In Anushasana Parva’s instruction-setting, Bhishma addresses a king (traditionally Yudhiṣṭhira) and warns about the consequences of alienating Brahmins through harsh conduct. He contrasts a degenerate present with an idealized past where Kshatriyas served Brahmins, and he frames the king’s refuge in Brahmins as the meaningful basis for rulership and social stability.