Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 37

Dāyavibhāga (Inheritance Apportionment) and Household Precedence — Dialogue of Yudhiṣṭhira and Bhīṣma

समीक्ष्य च बहून्‌ दोषान्‌ संवासाद्‌ विद्धि पाणयो: । यथा निष्ठाकरं शुल्क न जात्वासीत्‌ तथा शूणु

samīkṣya ca bahūn doṣān saṃvāsād viddhi pāṇayoḥ | yathā niṣṭhākaraṃ śulkaṃ na jātva āsīt tathā śṛṇu ||

ビーシュマは言った。「婚姻を、金銭の支払いによって保証される単なる同居とみなすなら、そこから生じる過失は多い。よく省みよ。『代価』だけで婚姻が最終的に確定するわけではない。古の世においても、そのような行いが定まった規範として受け入れられたことはない——いまより我が説くところを聞け。」

{'samīkṣya''having examined, after considering carefully', 'bahūn': 'many', 'doṣān': 'faults, moral defects, harmful consequences', 'saṃvāsāt': 'from cohabitation
{'samīkṣya':
from living together (as the defining basis)', 'viddhi''know, understand', 'pāṇayoḥ': 'of the two hands
from living together (as the defining basis)', 'viddhi':
idiomatically connected with pāṇigraha (the taking of the bride’s hand in marriage)', 'yathā''as, in such a way that', 'niṣṭhākaraṃ': 'bringing finality/settlement
idiomatically connected with pāṇigraha (the taking of the bride’s hand in marriage)', 'yathā':
making a matter firmly concluded', 'śulkam''price, fee, bride-price (payment connected with marriage)', 'na': 'not', 'jātva': 'ever, at any time', 'āsīt': 'was', 'tathā': 'thus, in that manner', 'śṛṇu': 'listen'}
making a matter firmly concluded', 'śulkam':

भीष्य उवाच

B
Bhīṣma

Educational Q&A

Bhīṣma warns that treating marriage as a transaction—where payment is assumed to finalize the union—creates serious moral and social defects. A legitimate marriage is grounded in dharma and proper rites/consent, not merely in money or cohabitation.

In Anuśāsana Parva, Bhīṣma is instructing on dharma. Here he addresses the issue of ‘buying and selling’ a maiden (kanyā-kraya-vikraya), urging careful reflection on its faults and stating that a paid ‘fee’ has never been a valid basis for conclusively establishing marriage.