Vīrya, Māyā/Prakṛti, Śrī’s Inseparability, Paramāṇu, and Hari’s Infinitude
परिच्छेदस्तथा व्याप्तेरेकरूपेपि युज्यते / तस्याचिन्त्याद्भुतैश्वर्यं व्यवहारार्थमेव च
paricchedastathā vyāpterekarūpepi yujyate / tasyācintyādbhutaiśvaryaṃ vyavahārārthameva ca
たとえ御身が同一の本性であっても、特定の御姿においては「限られる」と語り、同時に「遍満する」と語るのは相応しい。御身の不可思議にして驚異なる主宰の威徳(アイシュヴァリヤ)は、世間の理解と便宜の言説のためにのみ示されるからである。
Lord Vishnu (teaching Garuda/Vinata-putra)
Concept: The Lord is one in nature, yet language may describe Him as limited (in forms) and all-pervading; such descriptions serve practical understanding.
Vedantic Theme: Acintya-bhedābheda style reconciliation (without asserting real division): unity of essence with manifold expressions; vyavahāra as pedagogical necessity.
Application: Avoid rigid literalism: accept devotional form-language while maintaining metaphysical non-limitation; use paradox as a contemplative tool rather than a dispute.
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: adbhuta
Related Themes: Garuda Purana 3.3.50 (deśa-pariccheda admitted); Garuda Purana 3.3.52-53 (no limitation in guṇa/kāla; no bheda yet ‘aṇutva’ spoken)
This verse says such descriptions are pedagogical: although the Divine is one in nature, we speak of forms and all-pervasion to make spiritual truths understandable in everyday discourse.
By grounding the teaching that the Supreme can be present everywhere yet appear in specific forms, it supports devotion and right understanding—both of which guide the soul toward liberation rather than confusion about the Divine.
Use theological language as a tool: worship a chosen form with devotion while remembering the same Reality pervades all beings, encouraging humility, compassion, and steady practice.