Shloka 33
Vīrya, Māyā/Prakṛti, Śrī’s Inseparability, Paramāṇu, and Hari’s Infinitude
अतो नाहं ब्राह्मणस्त्वादिकालादुपाधिसंबन्धवशादज्ञताचेत् / सर्वज्ञोसौ कुत्र पक्षीन्द्र विष्णुरल्पज्ञजीवो ज्ञानशून्यश्च कुत्र
ato nāhaṃ brāhmaṇastvādikālādupādhisaṃbandhavaśādajñatācet / sarvajñosau kutra pakṣīndra viṣṇuralpajñajīvo jñānaśūnyaśca kutra
ゆえに、我は（ただの）バラモンではない。もし無始の時より、限定する付帯（ウパーディ）との結びつきによって無知が生じたというなら、鳥の主よ、全知のヴィシュヌはどこにあり、そして知の乏しい個我（ジーヴァ）—まるで知を欠くかのような—はどこにあるのか。
Lord Vishnu
Concept: If ignorance is due to beginningless association with limiting adjuncts, then one must account for the difference between omniscient Vishnu and the limited jīva; conflation is incoherent without careful qualification.
Vedantic Theme: Upādhi-viveka; distinction between Īśvara and jīva at the empirical level, with a push toward resolving apparent contradiction in identity doctrines.
Application: Separate essential nature from conditioned roles (profession, status, personality); analyze what in experience is ‘upādhi’ versus what is constant awareness.
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: vira
Related Themes: Garuda Purana 3.3.29-32 (prakṛti causality; Vishnu-only; omniscience vs ignorance)
FAQs
The verse explains that ignorance is not intrinsic to the Self; it appears due to association with upādhis (conditioning factors), which create the seeming distinction between the all-knowing Lord and the limited jīva.
It contrasts Viṣṇu as sarvajña (all-knowing) with the jīva as alpajña (limited in knowledge), indicating that limitation is tied to conditioned identity and ignorance rather than the ultimate nature of consciousness.
Do not reduce identity to labels (status, caste, roles); cultivate self-inquiry and disciplined living to lessen ignorance-driven conditioning and act from clarity, humility, and dharma.