Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 20

Adhyāya 17 — Gandhārī’s Vilāpa at Duryodhana’s Body (स्त्रीपर्व, अध्याय १७)

विदुरं हवमत्यैष पितरं चैव मन्दभाक्‌ | बालो वृद्धावमानेन मन्दो मृत्युवशं गत:,“यह मूर्ख और अभागा बालक विदुर तथा अपने पिताका अपमान करके बड़े-बूढ़ोंकी अवहेलनाके पापसे ही कालके गालमें चला गया है

viduraṁ havam aty eṣa pitaraṁ caiva mandabhāk | bālo vṛddhāvamānena mando mṛtyuvaśaṁ gataḥ |

Vaiśampāyana said: “This foolish, ill-fated boy, having insulted Vidura and even his own father, has—through the sin of scorning and dishonouring elders—fallen into the grasp of Death.”

विदुरम्Vidura (as object of insult)
विदुरम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootविदुर
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular
अवमत्याby contempt/with disrespect
अवमत्या:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootअवमति
FormFeminine, Instrumental, Singular
एषःthis (person)
एषः:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootएतद्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
पितरम्father
पितरम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootपितृ
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
एवindeed/just
एव:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootएव
मन्दभाग्ill-fated, unfortunate
मन्दभाग्:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootमन्दभाग
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
बालःboy/young person
बालः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootबाल
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
वृद्ध-अवमानेनby (the sin of) disrespecting elders
वृद्ध-अवमानेन:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootवृद्ध + अवमान
FormMasculine/Neuter, Instrumental, Singular
मन्दःdull-witted, foolish
मन्दः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootमन्द
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
मृत्यु-वशम्into the power of death
मृत्यु-वशम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootमृत्यु + वश
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular
गतःgone, has gone
गतः:
TypeVerb
Rootगम्
Formक्त (past passive participle), Masculine, Nominative, Singular

वैशम्पायन उवाच

V
Vaiśampāyana
V
Vidura
F
Father (of the boy, unnamed in this verse)
M
Mṛtyu (Death, personified)

Educational Q&A

Disrespect toward elders and the wise—especially through contempt and arrogance—is presented as a grave ethical fault (adharma) that ripens into destructive consequences; moral transgression is linked to inevitable downfall.

Vaiśampāyana comments on a young man’s fate, attributing his death to the wrongdoing of insulting Vidura and his own father and to the broader sin of scorning elders, framing the event as moral causality rather than mere accident.