Shloka 19

यद्यस्मासु प्रलीनेषु तर्पणं प्राणधारणम्‌ । भोगान्‌ भुद्क्ते भवान्‌ सत्यं यथैतन्मन्यते तथा,हमारा लय हो जानेपर भी आप तृप्त रह सकें, जीवन धारण कर सकें और सब प्रकारके भोग भोग सकें तो आप जैसा कहते और मानते हैं, वह सब सत्य हो सकता है

yady asmāsu pralīneṣu tarpaṇaṁ prāṇadhāraṇam | bhogān bhunkte bhavān satyaṁ yathaitat manyate tathā ||

Mind said: “If, even after we have dissolved (into our source), you are still able to find satisfaction, sustain life, and enjoy all objects of experience, then what you say and believe may indeed be true.”

यद्whatever/that which
यद्:
Karma
TypePronoun
Rootयद्
FormNeuter, Nominative/Accusative, Singular
अस्मासुin us/among us
अस्मासु:
Adhikarana
TypePronoun
Rootअस्मद्
Form—, Locative, Plural
प्रलीनेषुwhen (we are) dissolved/merged
प्रलीनेषु:
Adhikarana
TypeAdjective
Rootप्रलीन
FormMasculine, Locative, Plural
तर्पणम्satiation/refreshment
तर्पणम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootतर्पण
FormNeuter, Nominative/Accusative, Singular
प्राणधारणम्maintenance of life/breath
प्राणधारणम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootप्राणधारण
FormNeuter, Nominative/Accusative, Singular
भोगान्enjoyments/pleasures
भोगान्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootभोग
FormMasculine, Accusative, Plural
भुङ्क्तेenjoys/partakes
भुङ्क्ते:
Karta
TypeVerb
Rootभुज्
FormPresent, Third, Singular, Atmanepada
भवान्you (honorific)
भवान्:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootभवत्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
सत्यम्true/truth
सत्यम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootसत्य
FormNeuter, Nominative/Accusative, Singular
यथाas/just as
यथा:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootयथा
एतत्this
एतत्:
Karma
TypePronoun
Rootएतद्
FormNeuter, Nominative/Accusative, Singular
मन्यतेthinks/considers
मन्यते:
Karta
TypeVerb
Rootमन्
FormPresent, Third, Singular, Atmanepada
तथाso/thus
तथा:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootतथा

मन उवाच

मन (Mind)
भवान् (the addressed interlocutor)

Educational Q&A

The verse frames a conditional concession: if the addressee can truly remain satisfied, alive, and capable of enjoyment even when the ‘mind’ has dissolved, then the addressee’s claim about a deeper sustaining principle (beyond ordinary mental functioning) could be accepted as true. It probes whether enjoyment and life-support depend on the mind or on something more fundamental.

In a philosophical dialogue, ‘Mind’ addresses another principle/person and tests their assertion. Mind says that if the other can still maintain satisfaction, life, and enjoyment even after Mind’s dissolution, then Mind will grant that the other’s view is correct—setting up a debate about what truly underlies experience and vitality.