Shloka 32

शर्मिष्ठया यदुक्तास्मि दुह्तित्रा वृषपर्वण: । सत्यं किलैतत्‌ सा प्राह दैत्यानामसि गायन:,वृषपर्वाकी पुत्री शर्मिष्ठाने आज मुझसे जो कुछ कहा है, क्या यह सच है? वह कहती है --आप भाटोंकी तरह दैत्योंके गुण गाया करते हैं

śarmiṣṭhayā yad uktāsmi duhitṛā vṛṣaparvaṇaḥ | satyaṃ kilaitat sā prāha daityānām asi gāyanaḥ ||

Vaiśampāyana said: “What I have been told by Śarmiṣṭhā, the daughter of Vṛṣaparvan— is it really true? She says, ‘You are like a bard, singing the praises of the Daityas.’” The line conveys a pointed moral tension: speech can be used either to uphold truth and fairness or to flatter a side out of bias, and Śarmiṣṭhā’s remark accuses the listener of partiality rather than principled judgment.

शर्मिष्ठयाby Śarmiṣṭhā
शर्मिष्ठया:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootशर्मिष्ठा
FormFeminine, Instrumental, Singular
यत्what/that which
यत्:
Karma
TypePronoun
Rootयद्
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
उक्तम्said/spoken
उक्तम्:
Karma
TypeVerb
Rootवच्
FormPast passive participle (क्त), Neuter, Nominative/Accusative, Singular
अस्मिI am
अस्मि:
Karta
TypeVerb
Rootअस्
FormPresent (Lat), 1st, Singular
दुहित्राby the daughter
दुहित्रा:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootदुहितृ
FormFeminine, Instrumental, Singular
वृषपर्वणःof Vṛṣaparvan
वृषपर्वणः:
Sambandha
TypeNoun
Rootवृषपर्वन्
FormMasculine, Genitive, Singular
सत्यम्true
सत्यम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootसत्य
FormNeuter, Nominative/Accusative, Singular
किलindeed/they say
किल:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootकिल
एतत्this
एतत्:
Karma
TypePronoun
Rootएतद्
FormNeuter, Nominative/Accusative, Singular
साshe
सा:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootतद्
FormFeminine, Nominative, Singular
प्राहsaid
प्राह:
Karta
TypeVerb
Rootप्र+अह्
FormPerfect (Liṭ), 3rd, Singular
दैत्यानाम्of the Daityas
दैत्यानाम्:
Sambandha
TypeNoun
Rootदैत्य
FormMasculine, Genitive, Plural
असिyou are
असि:
Karta
TypeVerb
Rootअस्
FormPresent (Lat), 2nd, Singular
गायन्singing/praising
गायन्:
Karta
TypeVerb
Rootगै
FormPresent active participle (शतृ), Masculine, Nominative, Singular

वैशम्पायन उवाच

V
Vaiśampāyana
Ś
Śarmiṣṭhā
V
Vṛṣaparvan
D
Daityas

Educational Q&A

The verse highlights an ethical concern about speech and judgment: praising a group like a professional panegyrist can indicate bias. It implicitly values truthful, impartial assessment over flattering rhetoric.

Vaiśampāyana reports a pointed statement attributed to Śarmiṣṭhā, daughter of Vṛṣaparvan. She challenges someone’s stance by accusing them of acting like a bard who sings the Daityas’ praises, and the speaker asks whether this report is true.