Sati’s Death and the Assault on Daksha’s Sacrifice: Virabhadra versus the Devas
खड्गचर्मगदाप्रासपरश्वधवराङ्कुशैः चापमार्गणभृत्तस्थौ हन्तुकामो गणेश्वरम्
khaḍgacarmagadāprāsaparaśvadhavarāṅkuśaiḥ cāpamārgaṇabhṛttasthau hantukāmo gaṇeśvaram
Bersenjata pedang dan perisai, gada, tombak, kapak, serta angkuśa yang unggul, dan siap dengan busur serta anak panah, ia berniat membunuh Gaṇeśvara.
{ "primaryRasa": "raudra", "secondaryRasa": "vira", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
Aggression toward a dharmic/divine protector (here Gaṇeśvara) is portrayed as adharma; the verse foregrounds intent (hantukāma) as ethically weighty—violent intention itself is a moral fault that precipitates conflict and its consequences.
This is best classified under Vamśānucarita/Carita-type narrative material (accounts of deeds and events involving divine beings), rather than cosmogenesis (sarga/pratisarga) or manvantara cataloguing.
The piling up of weapons symbolizes the escalation of egoic force against divine order; Gaṇeśa, as the lord of gaṇas and remover of obstacles, becomes the ‘obstacle’ to adharmic intent—hence conflict arises where dharma blocks unrighteous aims.