यद्य॒त्र किंचित् प्रत्यक्षमहिंसाया: परं मतम् । ऋते त्वागमशास्त्रेभ्यो ब्रूहि तद् यदि पश्यसि
yady atra kiñcit pratyakṣam ahiṁsāyāḥ paraṁ matam | ṛte tv āgamaśāstrebhyo brūhi tad yadi paśyasi ||
Kapila berkata: Jika, di luar tradisi kitab-kitab suci, engkau melihat suatu ajaran yang nyata dan langsung yang melampaui ahimsa (tanpa kekerasan)—atau jika engkau dapat menunjukkan hasil yang benar-benar tampak dari ajaran yang mendorong kekerasan—maka nyatakanlah dengan terang, bila engkau sungguh melihatnya.
कपिल उवाच
Non-violence is presented as the highest ethical standard; any claim that violence yields a superior good must be demonstrated through direct experience and sound reasoning, not merely asserted on the basis of scriptural citation.
Kapila is debating a moral and philosophical point: he challenges the other party to produce any observable, verifiable benefit of violence (or any doctrine higher than ahiṁsā) independent of appeals to āgama and śāstra, thereby pressing for experiential proof in ethical argument.