Shloka 52

आत्ममांसोपवृत्तं च शरीरार्धमयीं तनुम्‌ । पितृणां वंशकर्तरिं वने त्यक्त्वा क्व यास्यथ,यह बालक तुम्हारे अपने ही रक्त-मांसका बना हुआ है, आधे शरीरके समान है और पितरोंके वंशकी वृद्धि करनेवाला है, इसे वनमें छोड़कर तुम कहाँ जाओगे?

ātmamāṃsopavṛttaṃ ca śarīrārdhamayīṃ tanum | pitṝṇāṃ vaṃśakartarīṃ vane tyaktvā kva yāsyatha ||

Jambuka berkata: “Anak ini hidup dari daging dan darahmu sendiri—seakan separuh dari tubuhmu—dan dialah yang akan meneruskan garis keturunan para leluhurmu. Setelah menelantarkannya di rimba, ke manakah kau kira dapat pergi?”

आत्ममांसोपवृत्तम्nourished by one’s own flesh
आत्ममांसोपवृत्तम्:
Karma
TypeAdjective
Rootआत्ममांसोपवृत्त (आत्मन् + मांस + उपवृत्त)
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
शरीरार्धमयीम्consisting of half (one’s) body
शरीरार्धमयीम्:
Karma
TypeAdjective
Rootशरीरार्धमयी (शरीर + अर्ध + मयी)
FormFeminine, Accusative, Singular
तनुम्body, person
तनुम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootतनु
FormFeminine, Accusative, Singular
पितृणाम्of the forefathers
पितृणाम्:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootपितृ
FormMasculine, Genitive, Plural
वंशकर्तरीम्the continuer/producer of the lineage
वंशकर्तरीम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootवंशकर्तृ (वंश + कर्तृ)
FormFeminine, Accusative, Singular
वनेin the forest
वने:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootवन
FormNeuter, Locative, Singular
त्यक्त्वाhaving abandoned
त्यक्त्वा:
TypeVerb
Rootत्यज्
FormAbsolutive (Gerund)
क्वwhere?
क्व:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootक्व
यास्यथwill you go
यास्यथ:
TypeVerb
Rootया
FormSimple Future (Luṭ), Second, Plural

जम्बुक उवाच

J
Jambuka
T
the child (bālaka)
A
ancestors (pitṛs)
F
forest (vana)

Educational Q&A

The verse asserts a strong ethical claim: one’s child is not separate from oneself (like half one’s body) and is the bearer of ancestral continuity; therefore abandoning the child is a grave breach of familial and ancestral duty (dharma).

Jambuka confronts someone who has left a child in the forest, arguing that the child—born of their own flesh and blood and essential for continuing the ancestors’ lineage—cannot be cast away, and challenges them: after such an act, where could they go (morally or socially) without blame?