Satya–Anṛta Viveka (Discrimination between Truth and Falsehood) | सत्य–अनृत विवेकः
किमाश्चर्य च यन्मूढो धर्मकामो<प्यधर्मवित् । सुमहत् प्राप्तुयात् पुण्यं गड़्ायामिव कौशिक:,कैसा आश्चर्य है कि धर्मकी इच्छा रखनेवाला मूर्ख (तपस्वी) (सत्य बोलकर भी) अधर्मके फलको प्राप्त हो जाता है। (कर्णपर्व अध्याय ६९) और गंगाके तटपर रहनेवाले एक उल्लूकी भाँति कोई (हिंसा करके भी) महान् पुण्य प्राप्त कर लेता हैः
kim āścaryaṃ ca yan mūḍho dharmakāmo 'py adharmavit | sumahat prāpnuyāt puṇyaṃ gaṅgāyām iva kauśikaḥ ||
Apa yang mengherankan jika seorang yang tersesat, meski menginginkan dharma, tetap memahami (atau menempuh) adharma dan karenanya meraih hasil yang amat besar? Demikian pula, seperti kisah Kauśika di tepi Gaṅgā, seseorang dapat memperoleh jasa besar melalui jalan yang tampak paradoks.
भीष्म उवाच
Bhīṣma highlights the subtlety of dharma: moral outcomes are not always straightforward. A person who intends dharma may still produce adharma due to delusion or misjudgment, while another may gain merit through actions that appear questionable when judged superficially. Dharma must be assessed with attention to intention, context, and the larger ethical order.
In Śānti Parva’s instruction on dharma, Bhīṣma addresses apparent contradictions in moral causality. He uses the exemplum of “Kauśika on the Gaṅgā” to illustrate that merit and demerit can accrue in unexpected ways, preparing the listener to accept nuanced, case-based ethical reasoning rather than rigid rules.