Previous Verse
Next Verse

Mahabharata — Anushasana Parva, Shloka 52

Cyavana’s Water-Vow and the Ethics of Cohabitation (स्नेह-सम्वास-धर्मः)

वैश्यस्य वर्तमानस्य वैश्यायां भरतर्षभ । शूद्रायां चापि कौन्तेय तयोविनियम: स्मृत:

vaiśyasya vartamānasya vaiśyāyāṃ bharatarṣabha | śūdrāyāṃ cāpi kaunteya tayor viniyamaḥ smṛtaḥ ||

Bhishma bersabda: “Wahai yang termulia di antara keturunan Bharata, wahai putra Kuntī: bila seorang Vaiśya yang hidup dalam dharma grihastha memiliki putra dari seorang perempuan Vaiśyā dan juga dari seorang perempuan Śūdrā, maka bagi mereka pun aturan pembagian (hak dan bagian harta) diingat sama, sesuai ketentuan yang telah ditetapkan bagi keturunan campuran demikian.”

वैश्यस्यof a Vaiśya
वैश्यस्य:
Sambandha
TypeNoun
Rootवैश्य
FormMasculine, Genitive, Singular
वर्तमानस्यexisting / living (of the one present)
वर्तमानस्य:
Sambandha
TypeAdjective
Rootवर्तमान
FormMasculine, Genitive, Singular
वैश्यायाम्in/through a Vaiśyā (woman)
वैश्यायाम्:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootवैश्या
FormFeminine, Locative, Singular
भरतर्षभO bull among the Bharatas
भरतर्षभ:
TypeNoun
Rootभरत-ऋषभ
FormMasculine, Vocative, Singular
शूद्रायाम्in/through a Śūdrā (woman)
शूद्रायाम्:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootशूद्रा
FormFeminine, Locative, Singular
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
अपिalso
अपि:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootअपि
कौन्तेयO son of Kuntī
कौन्तेय:
TypeNoun
Rootकौन्तेय
FormMasculine, Vocative, Singular
तयोःof those two
तयोः:
Sambandha
TypePronoun
Rootतद्
FormCommon, Genitive, Dual
विनियमःrule / regulation
विनियमः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootविनियम
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
स्मृतःis remembered / is prescribed
स्मृतः:
TypeVerb
Rootस्मृ
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular, Past passive participle (क्त)

भीष्म उवाच

B
Bhīṣma
Y
Yudhiṣṭhira (Kaunteya)
B
Bharatas (dynastic epithet)
V
Vaiśya
V
Vaiśyā
Ś
Śūdra
Ś
Śūdrā

Educational Q&A

The verse states that Smṛti tradition recognizes a specific, established rule (viniyama) for allocating wealth/entitlements when a Vaiśya has sons from both a Vaiśyā and a Śūdrā; Bhīṣma emphasizes that the distribution should follow the remembered legal-ethical regulation rather than personal preference.

In the Anuśāsana Parva, Bhīṣma instructs Yudhiṣṭhira on dharma and social-legal norms. Here he addresses a case of mixed parentage within a Vaiśya household and indicates that traditional law provides a defined rule for how the two sets of sons are to be treated in matters like division of property.