Droṇa–Drupada Saṃvāda and Droṇa’s Reception at the Kuru Court (द्रोण-द्रुपद-संवादः; कुरुनगरप्रवेशः)
यद् ब्रूयात् तत् तथा कार्यमिति वेदविदो विदु: । विशेषत: पुत्रगृध्यी हीन: प्रजननात् स्वयम्
vaiśampāyana uvāca | yad brūyāt tat tathā kāryam iti vedavido viduḥ | viśeṣataḥ putragṛdhī hīnaḥ prajananāt svayam |
Para ahli Veda menyatakan: Apa pun yang diucapkan suami, itulah yang harus dilaksanakan sebagaimana adanya—terutama bila sang suami mendambakan seorang putra namun dirinya sendiri kurang memiliki daya untuk berketurunan.
वैशम्पायन उवाच
The verse frames a dharma-claim grounded in Vedic authority: a wife is enjoined to carry out her husband’s directive, particularly when the directive concerns securing offspring for a husband who desires a son but cannot beget one himself—an ethical rationale that supports the later practice of niyoga in the narrative.
Vaiśampāyana, as narrator, states a normative principle about marital obedience and highlights a special case: a son-seeking but impotent/infertile husband. This sets up the story-context in which a husband may request his wife to obtain progeny through an appointed means.