HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 2Shloka 36
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 36

Sankhya YogaSankhya Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 36 illustration

अवाच्यवादांश्च बहून्वदिष्यन्ति तवाहिताः । निन्दन्तस्तव सामर्थ्यं ततो दुःखतरं नु किम् ॥ २.३६ ॥

avācyavādāṁś ca bahūn vadiṣyanti tavāhitāḥ | nindantas tava sāmarthyaṁ tato duḥkhataraṁ nu kim || 2.36 ||

Musuh-musuh yang menghendaki keburukan bagimu akan mengucapkan banyak kata yang tidak patut, mencela kemampuanmu; adakah yang lebih menyakitkan daripada itu?

Your enemies will speak many unbecoming words, censuring your ability; what can be more painful than that?

Your ill-wishers will utter many things that ought not be said, disparaging your capacity; what could be more distressing than that?

avācya-vāda indicates “unspeakable/unseemly talk,” often rendered as “abusive words.” The verse continues the honor/shame line of persuasion; the stress is on public disparagement rather than physical harm.

अवाच्यunspeakable, disgraceful
अवाच्य:
Karma
Rootअवाच्य
वादान्words/speeches (talk)
वादान्:
Karma
Rootवाद
and
:
Root
बहून्many
बहून्:
Karma
Rootबहु
वदिष्यन्तिthey will speak
वदिष्यन्ति:
Root√वद्
तवof you/your
तव:
Rootयुष्मद्
अहिताःill-wishers, those who desire your harm
अहिताः:
Karta
Rootअहित
निन्दन्तःcensuring, reviling
निन्दन्तः:
Karta
Root√निन्द्
तवyour
तव:
Rootयुष्मद्
सामर्थ्यम्ability, prowess, competence
सामर्थ्यम्:
Karma
Rootसामर्थ्य
ततःthan that; thereafter/from that
ततः:
Rootततः
दुःखतरम्more painful, more sorrowful
दुःखतरम्:
Rootदुःखतर
नुindeed/then (interrogative emphasis)
नु:
Rootनु
किम्what?
किम्:
Rootकिम्
Krishna
DharmaKīrti/Akīrti (fame/infamy)Kṣānti (forbearance, implicit contrast)
Public criticismFortitudeEthical resolve

FAQs

It identifies anticipated humiliation and ridicule as powerful drivers of anxiety, showing how fear of judgment can amplify avoidance.

The metaphysical layer is secondary here; the verse operates at the level of ethics and psychology within the epic’s social world.

Krishna underscores that withdrawal would invite disparagement from opponents, thereby urging Arjuna to align action with his role.

It can be applied to resilience: learning to act from considered principles rather than being governed by the prospect of others’ negative commentary.