Shloka 2
निर्णये वा महाबुद्धे सर्वधर्मविदां वर । प्रत्यक्षमागमो वेति कि तयो: कारणं भवेत्
Vaiśampāyana uvāca: nirṇaye vā mahābuddhe sarvadharmavidāṃ vara | pratyakṣam āgamo veti kiṃ tayoḥ kāraṇaṃ bhavet ||
सम्पूर्ण धर्मज्ञों में श्रेष्ठ महाबुद्धिमान् पितामह! धर्म-विषय का निर्णय करने के लिए प्रत्यक्ष प्रमाण का आश्रय लेना चाहिए या आगम का? इन दोनों में से सिद्धान्त-निर्णय में मुख्य कारण कौन-सा होता है?
वैशम्पायन उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse frames a foundational inquiry in dharma-discourse: when ethical or religious conclusions are disputed, what counts as the primary pramāṇa (means of valid knowledge)—direct perception (pratyakṣa) or authoritative tradition/scripture (āgama)?
Vaiśampāyana reports a question addressed to the Pitāmaha (Bhīṣma) in the Anuśāsana context: the interlocutor seeks guidance on how to adjudicate dharma—by what is directly seen/experienced or by what is transmitted as authoritative teaching.