Śiśupāla-vadha in the Rājasūya-sabhā (शिशुपालवधः — राजसूयसभायाम्)
येन धर्मात्मना5>त्मानं ब्रह्मण्यमविजानता । नेषितं पाद्यमस्मै तद् दातुमग्रे दुरात्मने
yena dharmātmanātmānaṁ brāhmaṇyam avijānātā | neṣitaṁ pādyam asmai tad dātum agre durātmane ||
એ ધર્માત્માએ મને બ્રાહ્મણ અતિથિ તરીકે ન ઓળખીને, આ દુરાત્માને શરૂઆતમાં જ પાદ્યાદિ (અતિથિસત્કાર) આપવાનું ટાળ્યું।
शिशुपाल उवाच
The verse foregrounds the dharmic weight of atithi-satkāra (honoring a guest). Withholding customary honors like pādya is framed as a moral failing, while also showing how claims of dharma can be weaponized through social-status arguments.
Śiśupāla is criticizing an opponent as ‘dharmātmā’ only in name, alleging that he refused to offer him pādya—an honor due to a Brahmin guest—because he did not acknowledge Śiśupāla’s brahminical standing. Jarāsandha is referenced as the setting/context for this grievance.