Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 13

Adhyāya 39 — Yudhiṣṭhira’s inquiry on attachment (saṅga) and relational restraint

सोम उवाच ब्राह्म॒णास्तपसा सर्वे सिध्यन्ते वाग्वला: सदा । भुजवीर्याश्व राजानो वागस्त्राश्न द्विजातय:

Soma uvāca—brāhmaṇās tapasā sarve sidhyante vāg-balāḥ sadā | bhuja-vīryāś ca rājāno vāg-astra-āś ca dvijātayaḥ ||

સોમે કહ્યું—“બધા બ્રાહ્મણો તપસ્યાથી જ સિદ્ધ થાય છે; તેમનું બળ સદા વાણીમાં રહે છે. રાજાઓનું બળ ભુજાબળમાં છે, અને દ્વિજોનુ શસ્ત્ર વાણી જ છે.”

सोमःSoma (the Moon)
सोमः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootसोम
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
उवाचsaid
उवाच:
TypeVerb
Rootवच्
FormPerfect, 3rd, Singular
ब्राह्मणाःBrahmins
ब्राह्मणाः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootब्राह्मण
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
तपसाby austerity
तपसा:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootतपस्
FormNeuter, Instrumental, Singular
सर्वेall
सर्वे:
TypeAdjective
Rootसर्व
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
सिध्यन्तेattain success / are accomplished
सिध्यन्ते:
TypeVerb
Rootसिध्
FormPresent, 3rd, Plural, Atmanepada
वाग्बलाःwhose strength is speech
वाग्बलाः:
TypeAdjective
Rootवाग्बल
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
सदाalways
सदा:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootसदा
भुजवीर्याश्चhaving arm-strength, and
भुजवीर्याश्च:
TypeAdjective
Rootभुजवीर्य
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
राजानःkings
राजानः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootराजन्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
वागस्त्राःhaving speech as weapon
वागस्त्राः:
TypeAdjective
Rootवागस्त्र
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
द्विजातयःtwice-born (Brahmins)
द्विजातयः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootद्विजाति
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural

सोम उवाच

S
Soma
B
Brāhmaṇas
R
Rājānas (kings)
D
Dvijātis (twice-born)

Educational Q&A

The verse contrasts forms of power aligned with dharma: brāhmaṇas achieve through tapas and wield vāk (speech) as their enduring strength, while kings rely on physical might; for the twice-born, disciplined speech functions as a true weapon.

Soma is instructing (in a didactic context) by defining the distinctive sources of efficacy for different social roles—ascetic discipline and authoritative speech for brāhmaṇas versus martial strength for rulers—thereby framing ethical power as role-appropriate.