HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 3Shloka 24
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 24

Karma YogaKarma Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 24 illustration

उत्सीदेयुरिमे लोका न कुर्यां कर्म चेदहम् । संकरस्य च कर्ता स्यामुपहन्यामिमाः प्रजाः ॥ ३.२४ ॥

utsīdeyur ime lokā na kuryāṁ karma ced aham | saṅkarasya ca kartā syām upahanyām imāḥ prajāḥ || 3.24 ||

જો હું કર્મ ન કરું, તો આ લોકોએ વિનાશ પામે; હું વર્ણસંકરનો કર્તા બની આ પ્રજાને હાનિ પહોંચાડું.

These worlds would fall into ruin if I did not perform action; I would become the agent of social confusion and would harm these beings.

These communities would collapse if I did not do action; I would be a maker of mixture/disorder, and I would undermine these creatures.

Saṅkara is often read traditionally as ‘varṇa-saṅkara’ (social/role confusion), while a literal academic gloss can keep it broader as ‘mixing’ or ‘disorder.’ The ethical point remains: neglect by exemplars destabilizes collective life.

उत्सीदेयुःwould perish / would collapse
उत्सीदेयुः:
Root√सद् (सीद्) उपसर्गः उत्
इमेthese
इमे:
Karta
Rootइदम्
लोकाःworlds / people
लोकाः:
Karta
Rootलोक
not
:
Root
कुर्याम्I would do
कुर्याम्:
Root√कृ
कर्मaction / duty
कर्म:
Karma
Rootकर्मन्
चेत्if
चेत्:
Rootचेत्
अहम्I
अहम्:
Karta
Rootअहम्
संकरस्यof confusion / of intermixture
संकरस्य:
Rootसंकर
and
:
Root
कर्ताdoer / maker
कर्ता:
Karta
Rootकर्तृ (कृ + तृच्)
स्याम्I would be
स्याम्:
Root√अस्
उपहन्याम्I would harm / I would destroy
उपहन्याम्:
Root√हन् उपसर्गः उप
इमाःthese
इमाः:
Karma
Rootइदम्
प्रजाःcreatures / people / subjects
प्रजाः:
Karma
Rootप्रजा
Krishna
KarmaLokasaṅgrahaSaṅkara
Maintenance of social stabilityConsequences of neglectCollective welfare

FAQs

It highlights how perceived abandonment of duty by respected figures can trigger demoralization and norm breakdown in groups.

Even if the ultimate self is untouched, embodied life operates through causal and social networks; wise action can preserve conducive conditions for ethical and spiritual progress.

Krishna strengthens the case that action is not merely personal striving but also a stabilizing force within the world of relationships and institutions.

Public-facing roles (teachers, officials, managers) can treat consistent duty as a form of stewardship that prevents organizational drift.