Shukra’s Curse on King Danda and Prahlada’s Counsel to Andhaka on Dharma
हयग्रीवः कालनेमिः संह्लादः कालनाशनः शरभः शलभश्चैव विप्रचित्तिश्च वीर्यवान्
hayagrīvaḥ kālanemiḥ saṃhlādaḥ kālanāśanaḥ śarabhaḥ śalabhaścaiva vipracittiśca vīryavān
Saromahatmya (Sarasvati–Saro/Tirtha Cycle)
{ "primaryRasa": "vira", "secondaryRasa": "raudra", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
No. In many Purāṇic corpora “Hayagrīva” can denote either a demon or a divine manifestation depending on context. Here it appears in a daitya roster opposing Śiva, so it should be read as an asura named Hayagrīva.
Certain names function in multiple registers: Śarabha can be a mythic creature and also a Śaiva-associated epithet in other narratives. This verse uses it as a warrior-name within an asura list, illustrating how Purāṇic onomastics can cross sectarian story-worlds.
It highlights Vipracitti’s exceptional martial potency and signals his prominence among the coalition. Such epithets help listeners recognize hierarchy within a compressed catalogue.