Adhyaya 37 — Alarka’s Crisis and the Teaching on Non-Attachment (Madālasa’s Instruction Recalled)
न्यूूनातिरिक्ततां याति पञ्चकेऽस्मिन् सुखासुखम् ।
यदि स्यान्म किन्न स्यादन्यस्थेऽपि हि तन्मयि ॥
nyūnātiriktatāṃ yāti pañcake ’smin sukhāsukham | yadi syān ma kin na syād anyasthe ’pi hi tan-mayi ||
Le plaisir et la douleur se rencontrent comme manque ou excès au sein de cet agrégat quintuple (le complexe incarné). S’ils m’appartenaient réellement, pourquoi ne subsisteraient-ils pas pour moi même lorsque je demeure ailleurs, séparé de lui, alors que ma nature est celle de la conscience ?
{ "primaryRasa": "shanta", "secondaryRasa": "jnana", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
Pleasure and pain fluctuate due to conditions in the embodied complex; therefore one should not claim them as the Self. Ethically, this supports equanimity and reduced attachment/aversion.
Not a pañcalakṣaṇa topic (sarga/pratisarga/vaṃśa/manvantara/vaṃśānucarita); it belongs to upadeśa (instruction) embedded in narrative dialogue.
‘Deficiency/excess’ hints that sukha-duḥkha are measurable modifications (vikāra) of the kośa-complex; the witnessing Self is non-quantifiable and thus not their locus.