Shloka 52
अम्बा–राम–भीष्म संवादः
Amba–Rama–Bhishma Dialogue on Vow and Refuge
ब्रह्महत्या न तस्य स्यादिति धर्मेषु निश्चय: । क्षत्रियाणां स्थितो धर्मे क्षत्रियोडस्मि तपोधन
brahmahatyā na tasya syād iti dharmeṣu niścayaḥ | kṣatriyāṇāṃ sthito dharme kṣatriyo ’smi tapodhana |
Rāma dit : «Les traités du dharma tranchent sans équivoque sur ce point : si un brahmane adopte la manière de combattre d’un kṣatriya—portant arc et flèches, s’avançant avec colère pour livrer bataille sans tourner le dos dans la fuite—alors le guerrier qui le tue, le voyant en cet état, n’encourt pas le péché de brahmanicide. Ô ascète riche en austérités, je suis un kṣatriya, établi dans le dharma des kṣatriyas.»
राम उवाच
Educational Q&A
Moral culpability is assessed by role and conduct in a given situation: when a Brahmin adopts the kṣatriya’s battlefield posture and engages as a combatant, the act of killing him in that combat is treated under the rules of war rather than as brahmahatyā; the speaker grounds this in dharma-textual precedent and affirms his own kṣatriya duty.
Rāma addresses an ascetic (tapodhana) and justifies a wartime ethical rule: he states that dharma authorities hold that killing a Brahmin who has entered battle like a kṣatriya does not bring the specific sin of Brahmin-slaying, and he frames his stance as consistent with his identity and obligations as a kṣatriya.