Shloka 29
Nārāyaṇasya Guhya-nāmāni Niruktāni (Etymologies of Nārāyaṇa’s Secret Epithets) / नारायणस्य गुह्यनामानि निरुक्तानि
अलें परिग्रहेणेह दोषवान् हि परिग्रह: । कृमिर्हि कोषकारस्तु बध्यते स परिग्रहात्
alaṁ parigraheṇeha doṣavān hi parigrahaḥ | kṛmir hi koṣakāras tu badhyate sa parigrahāt ||
Nārada dit : Ici, nul besoin d’amasser de nombreuses possessions, car l’attachement à l’acquisition est, en vérité, lourd de fautes. Le ver à soie, bien qu’il façonne son cocon, se trouve lié précisément par cette accumulation : sa propre collecte devient sa servitude.
नारद उवाच
Educational Q&A
Excessive acquisition (parigraha) is inherently blameworthy because it breeds attachment and becomes a cause of bondage; contentment and non-accumulation are praised as conducive to freedom.
Nārada is instructing his listener within the Śānti Parva’s discourse on dharma and liberation, using the silkworm’s cocoon as a vivid example: what one gathers and builds for oneself can become the very trap that binds.