Rudra-Śiva: Names, Two Natures, and the Logic of Epithets (रुद्रनाम-बहुरूपत्व-प्रकरणम्)
एतन्मे संशयं देव मुनिधर्मकृतं विभो । सर्वरधर्मार्थतत्त्वज्ञ देवदेव वदस्व मे । निखिलेन मया पृष्टं महादेव यथातथम्
etan me saṁśayaṁ deva munidharmakṛtaṁ vibho | sarvadharmārthatattvajña devadeva vadasva me | nikhilena mayā pṛṣṭaṁ mahādeva yathātatham ||
Ô Seigneur, ce doute qui est le mien concerne le dharma pratiqué par les sages. Ô Toi qui pénètres tout, ô Dieu des dieux, toi qui connais l’essence véritable et le dessein de toute forme de dharma, dis-le-moi. Ô Mahādeva, je t’ai interrogé pleinement ; explique-le-moi donc entièrement et exactement tel qu’il est.
श्रीमहेश्वर उवाच
The verse frames dharma as something with an inner ‘tattva’ (essence) and ‘artha’ (purpose) that must be understood from an authoritative, truth-knowing source. It models ethical inquiry: when confused about right conduct—especially the specialized discipline of sages—one should ask clearly and seek a complete, accurate explanation rather than partial or convenient answers.
A speaker addresses Mahādeva (Śiva) with reverence, stating that a doubt has arisen regarding the dharma of sages (muni-dharma). He appeals to Śiva as the knower of the essence of all dharmas and requests a full, precise response to the questions he has posed.