HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 3Shloka 6
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 6

Karma YogaKarma Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 6 illustration

कर्मेन्द्रियाणि संयम्य य आस्ते मनसा स्मरन् । इन्द्रियार्थान्विमूढात्मा मिथ्याचारः स उच्यते ॥ ३.६ ॥

karmendriyāṇi saṃyamya ya āste manasā smaran | indriyārthān vimūḍhātmā mithyācāraḥ sa ucyate || 3.6 ||

Celui qui, maîtrisant les organes de l’action, demeure assis en se remémorant par l’esprit les objets des sens — cet être à l’âme égarée est appelé un hypocrite.

One who restrains the organs of action but sits dwelling in the mind on sense-objects—such a deluded person is called a hypocrite.

Restraining the organs of action, the one who remains (inactive) while mentally recalling sense-objects—such a person, of confused self-understanding, is said to be of false conduct.

‘Mithyācāra’ is often rendered ‘hypocrite,’ but more literally denotes ‘false/inauthentic practice.’ The emphasis is on inner consistency: external restraint without cognitive-emotional transformation is incomplete.

कर्मेन्द्रियाणिthe organs of action
कर्मेन्द्रियाणि:
Karma
Rootकर्मेन्द्रिय (कर्म + इन्द्रिय)
संयम्यhaving restrained
संयम्य:
Root√यम् (सम्-यम्)
यःwho
यः:
Karta
Rootयद्
आस्तेsits; remains
आस्ते:
Root√आस्
मनसाby the mind; with the mind
मनसा:
Karana
Rootमनस्
स्मरन्remembering; dwelling on
स्मरन्:
Root√स्मृ
इन्द्रियार्थान्the objects of the senses
इन्द्रियार्थान्:
Karma
Rootइन्द्रियार्थ (इन्द्रिय + अर्थ)
विमूढात्माone whose self is deluded
विमूढात्मा:
Karta
Rootविमूढात्मन् (वि + मूढ + आत्मन्)
मिथ्याचारःa hypocrite; one of false conduct
मिथ्याचारः:
Karta
Rootमिथ्याचार (मिथ्या + आचार)
सःhe
सः:
Karta
Rootतद्
उच्यतेis called; is said to be
उच्यते:
Root√वच्
KrishnaArjuna
IndriyasManasSelf-disciplineAttachmentEthical authenticity
Inner-outer congruenceCritique of superficial asceticismMental fixation as bondage

FAQs

The verse identifies a split between outward behavior and inward preoccupation. It suggests that sustainable self-control requires working with attention and desire, not only suppressing behavior.

It implies that bondage is maintained at the level of identification and craving; mere physical restraint does not dissolve the underlying dispositions (saṃskāras) that perpetuate cyclic patterns.

Krishna cautions Arjuna against equating renunciation with simply not acting; the quality of mind and motive is central to the Gītā’s account of discipline.

In ethics and self-improvement, performative restraint (appearing disciplined) can coexist with compulsive attention to the very things one claims to renounce. The verse recommends integrity: align habits, intentions, and attention-training.