HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 3Shloka 1
Next Verse

Shloka 1

Karma YogaKarma Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 1 illustration

अर्जुन उवाच । ज्यायसी चेत्कर्मणस्ते मता बुद्धिर्जनार्दन तत्किं कर्मणि घोरे मां नियोजयसि केशव ॥ ३.१ ॥

arjuna uvāca | jyāyasī cet karmaṇas te matā buddhir janārdana tat kiṁ karmaṇi ghore māṁ niyojayasi keśava || 3.1 ||

Arjuna dit : Si, ô Janārdana, Tu tiens la connaissance (buddhi) pour supérieure à l’action, pourquoi donc m’engages-Tu, ô Keśava, dans cette action redoutable ?

Arjuna said: If You consider knowledge (buddhi) superior to action, O Janārdana, then why do You urge me to engage in this difficult action, O Keśava?

Arjuna said: If, in your view, understanding is better than action, O Janārdana, then why do you enjoin me upon such arduous action, O Keśava?

Karmaṇi ghore is commonly rendered ‘terrible’ or ‘dreadful’; in context it can be read as ‘formidable/arduous duty’ within a martial-social setting, or more broadly as demanding ethical action under pressure.

अर्जुनःArjuna
अर्जुनः:
Karta
Rootअर्जुन
उवाचsaid
उवाच:
Root√वच्
ज्यायसीsuperior (higher)
ज्यायसी:
Rootज्यायस्
चेत्if
चेत्:
Rootचेत्
कर्मणःof action
कर्मणः:
Rootकर्मन्
तेyour
ते:
Rootयुष्मद्
मताconsidered; held (to be)
मता:
Root√मन् (मत)
बुद्धिःintellect; understanding
बुद्धिः:
Karta
Rootबुद्धि
जनार्दनO Janārdana
जनार्दन:
Rootजनार्दन
तत्then; that
तत्:
Rootतद्
किम्why? what?
किम्:
Rootकिम्
कर्मणिin action; in the act
कर्मणि:
Adhikarana
Rootकर्मन्
घोरेterrible; dreadful
घोरे:
Rootघोर
माम्me
माम्:
Karma
Rootअस्मद्
नियोजयसिyou engage; you impel; you enjoin
नियोजयसि:
Root√युज् (नि-युज्)
केशवO Keśava
केशव:
Rootकेशव
Arjuna
KarmaBuddhiŚreyas (the good)Dharma
Tension between contemplation and actionEthical duty under strainClarification request

FAQs

Arjuna articulates cognitive dissonance: he hears praise of inner wisdom yet faces a demanding obligation, prompting a need for an integrated framework.

The question sets up the Gītā’s synthesis: insight is not necessarily opposed to action; later verses argue for action informed by non-attachment and right understanding.

This opens Chapter 3 by challenging the apparent hierarchy implied in Chapter 2, pressing Krishna to reconcile jñāna-oriented teaching with prescribed duty.

It parallels dilemmas where reflective ideals seem to conflict with practical responsibilities—e.g., whether to withdraw or to act in complex social situations.