Draupadī’s Lament and the Question of Kṣatriya Forbearance (द्रौपद्याः शोकप्रलापः क्षमानिर्णयश्च)
प्रह्माद उवाच न श्रेय: सततं तेजो न नित्य॑ं श्रेयसी क्षमा | इति तात विजानीहि द्वयमेतदसंशयम्,प्रह्नाद बोले--तात! न तो तेज ही सदा श्रेष्ठ है और न क्षमा ही। इन दोनोंके विषयमें मेरा ऐसा ही निश्चय जानो, इसमें संशय नहीं है
prahmāda uvāca | na śreyaḥ satataṃ tejo na nityaṃ śreyasī kṣamā | iti tāta vijānīhi dvayam etad asaṃśayam ||
Dijo Prahlāda: “Hijo querido, el puro brillo o la fuerza no son siempre el bien supremo; ni la paciencia es siempre el camino mejor. Sábelo con firmeza: en estas dos—poder y tolerancia—no hay una sola regla que valga para toda situación.”
प्रह्माद उवाच
The verse teaches situational discernment in dharma: neither force/authority (tejas) nor forgiveness/patience (kṣamā) is universally the best. One must judge context and choose the appropriate response rather than clinging to a single virtue as absolute.
Prahmāda addresses a younger listener (“tāta”), offering counsel on conduct. He frames a moral principle: the right course alternates between firmness and forbearance depending on circumstances, and he states this as a settled conviction.