तत्र चेन्न भवेदेवं संशय: कर्मसिद्धये । कि तु कर्म स्वभावो<यं ज्ञानं कर्मेति वा पुन:,यदि कर्ममें संशय न हो तो वह सिद्धि देनेवाला होता है। यहाँ संदेह यह होता है कि क्या यह कर्म स्वभावसिद्ध है अथवा ज्ञानजनित?
tatra cen na bhaved evaṁ saṁśayaḥ karmasiddhaye | kintu karma svabhāvo ’yaṁ jñānaṁ karmeti vā punaḥ ||
Si en este asunto no hubiera duda, la acción sería en verdad un medio directo de logro. Pero aquí surge la duda: ¿procede esta acción sólo de la naturaleza innata, o debe entenderse, una vez más, como acción fundada en el conocimiento?
व्यास उवाच
The verse highlights a key philosophical problem: action would be a clear means to attainment if it were free from doubt, but uncertainty persists about whether action is merely driven by innate nature (svabhāva) or whether true action must be informed and transformed by knowledge (jñāna).
Vyāsa frames a reflective inquiry within the Śānti Parva’s instruction: he points out that the discussion turns on a doubt about the basis of karma—whether it is simply natural impulse or a disciplined practice rooted in understanding—thereby setting up further clarification on the relation between knowledge and action.